Has Auckland’s draft density rules got you thinking about uplift potential?
- James McKay

- Oct 9
- 2 min read
I’ve had calls from both buyers chasing redevelopment potential and sellers worried about hazard overlays. That tells me one thing: Auckland’s draft density rules are already shaping decisions.
Some may call it speculation. But there’s no doubt that there is a bit of excitement about redevelopment potential and possible value uplift with the new draft housing density rules for Auckland.
Put simply, the draft rules would allow taller buildings near transport hubs, restrict development in hazard-prone areas, and may reduce density in some suburbs. The blanket three-storey rule could also disappear.
It’s important to remember that density potential isn’t a given. These changes are still in draft, and you shouldn’t buy or sell today based on uncertain potential. If you need to make a move before the changes are confirmed, base your decisions on today’s value.
If you’re looking to sell with development potential, you’ll need clarity on zoning, overlays, and consent pathways to position your property for maximum value. If you’re buying with development potential, you’ll need to test assumptions carefully.
In both cases, strong legal due diligence is essential. The right advice, taken early, can help you unlock value at the right time and avoid costly surprises.
We will be closely monitoring developments as the law progresses and will provide updates on key changes and what they mean for property owners and developers.
Get in touch with our team if you're considering buying or selling in what could potentially be zoned as a high-density area.
Disclaimer
This publication reflects the personal views of the author about the subject matters discussed, and is based upon sources reasonably believed to be reliable and accurate. The views of the author do not necessarily reflect the views of Wilson McKay Barristers & Solicitors. No part of the compensation of the author was, is, or will be, directly or indirectly, related to any specific recommendations or views expressed. The information in this publication is solely for information purposes and is not intended to be legal advice. Readers should not act on the information without consulting qualified professionals to consider their specific circumstances.




Comments